Linguistic Methodology

Setting the empirical record straight: Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust and replicable

Branigan and Pickering advocate the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representations and argue it overcomes several purported deficiencies of acceptability judgments. While we recognize the merit of drawing attention to a …

Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments

Previous investigations into the validity of acceptability judgment data have focused almost exclusively on _type I errors_ (or false positives) because of the consequences of such errors for syntactic theories (Sprouse & Almeida 2012; Sprouse et al. …

The 469 data points that form the empirical foundation of generative syntactic theory are at least 98% replicable using formal experiments

Acceptability judgment collection in the field of generative syntax has generally proceeded informally, that is, without the formal methods familiar from experimental psychology. Two types of arguments have been proposed for the adoption of formal …

Power in acceptability judgment experiments and the reliability of data in syntax

The literature on acceptability judgment methodology has been recently dominated by two trends: criticisms of traditional informal judgment experiments as coarse and unreliable, and endorsement of larger, formal judgment experiments as more sensitive …

A quantitative defense of linguistic methodology

It is often argued that the current divide between linguistic theory and other domains of language research can be traced to the unreliability of linguistic methodology, and the resulting unreliability of linguistic theory. Linguists rely upon …